Madonna University advertisement
Lawrence Technological University banner ad

International Students Pay the Price

Map U.S. showing downward trend of international student enrollment for fall 2017 courtesy Inside Higher Ed
Map U.S. showing downward trend of international enrollment for fall 2017

International students in the U.S. undeniably add value to cultural diversification. For institutions of higher learning, particularly public colleges and universities, boasting an international student body is one way of ensuring diversity requirements are met, it is also a tool for bolstering the school’s image, and a means of pleasing stakeholders.

According to data compiled by U.S. News Services, during the 2016-2017 school year, there were a total of 1,078,822 international students studying at colleges and universities across the country.

As the U.S. faces economic challenges, the cost of education continues to rise, endowments dwindle, and institutions of higher learning suffer cuts in the federal and state contributions to their budgets. Many colleges are faced with the challenge of prioritizing their obligations to in-state students. Many institutions nationwide have imposed policies on international students that work in tandem with those obligations: much higher tuition fees and additional fees for international students, and “need-aware” policies that require proof of the ability to pay tuition without the need for aid before an admission decision is made.

As highlighted by the U.S News Services data, international students are a lucrative source of revenue. During the 2016-2017 school year, they contributed $36.9 billion to the U.S. economy and supported more than 450,331 jobs nationwide. In Michigan, 34,296 international students across the state contributed $1.1 billion to the state economy and supporting 14,444 jobs.

International students are mostly full-fee paying students. They are not eligible for federal or state aid; few private as well as institutional scholarships are available to them and most are inadequate. To be eligible for private student loans, they must be creditworthy and have a U.S citizen of good credit standing willing to co-sign on the loan with them, a rather huge commitment to ask of someone.

International students mostly pay out of pocket or depend on the support of family to cover their cost. In some cases, they receive grants and scholarships from their own governments or private entities in their home countries. However, these scholarships and grants are awarded depend on admission letters which “need-aware” universities are not willing to issue without proof of finances.

International students can be eligible to work while attending college. However, unless they have special permission from the Department of Homeland Security, they are only allowed to work for the college or university they are attending for 20 hours or less per week, and campus jobs rarely pay more than minimum wage. What they earn from student jobs is not sufficient to subsidize the cost of attendance. Based on 2017-18 Fall/Winter enrollment, the average estimated cost of attendance for full-time international students living off campus (not with family) to attend Henry Ford College is $18,286. The average cost for in-district students is $14,830, and the cost for out of district students is $16,510. The average estimated cost of attendance for full-time undergraduate international students living off campus to attend the University of Michigan-Dearborn is $36,750, and the average cost for resident students living off campus is $24,832. When excluding cost of living expenses, the average full-time tuition for international students is $23,232 while the in-state full-time tuition average is $11,314. The disparities in the cost of attendance between international students and in-state students are staggering. The biggest difference in costs is in tuition and fees. On average, international students pay two to three times as much in tuition as in-state students do. While it is understandable that there are additional costs in providing certain services to international students, surely these costs do not justify such a huge difference in fees.

While public institutions of higher learning must strive to stay afloat in challenging times, to foster inclusion and fairness and create a vibrant international academic community that is representative of all, it is imperative to recognize that these disparities in tuition, fees and admissions policies can be construed as exploitative and exclusionary. Used to subsidize institutional budgets, international students bear the brunt of the increase in the cost of education, and as a result, colleges and universities are giving preferential treatment to a specific class of students while excluding others from pursuing higher education in the U.S.

Share it now!